There are NCAA Brackets everywhere.
You have many brackets to choose from. You can play for big prizes (the perfect bracket would get you $1 million). You can play for fame against friends, co-workers or the nation.
Either way, this is the time of year to play the brackets. Also, it is the time of year some marketers latch onto the bracket to become relevant. There are several different methods to get into the madness: Go with the Flow or Create Your Own Path.
The idea of Going with the Flow is to sponsor an existing bracket on a major sports site. For example, Hooters has taken center stage on Fox Sports (Fox Sports Hooters Bracket Challenge). The Hooters/Fox brackets participants can win cash prizes and wings.
ESPN (ESPN Tournament Challenge), Yahoo! (Yahoo! Tourney Pick’em), and CBS Sports (CBS Sports Bracket Manager) also have sponsorships from State Farm (ESPN), KFC (Yahoo!) and Enterprise Rent-a-Car (CBS). As you can see by clicking on the links, the Hooters sponsorship is much more demonstrative than State Farm (logo), KFC (logo), and Enterprise (banner).
Creating Your Own Path means creating an autonomous bracket on your own site. For example, Buffalo Wild Wings hosts their own bracket challenge (Buffalo Wild Wings Bracket Challenge). The BWW contest is the same as last year with a character named Brandy teasing participants by claiming she will win, because “You know to much.” BWW participants have an opportunity to win an HDTV with surround sound, camcorders, and gift cards.
Both strategies have pros and cons. Positives for Going with the Flow are the natural traffic to the sports sites and low development costs. The primary drawback is ownership. Sponsoring will get a brand exposure, but do they really own the activity? Hooters will benefit more than the other marketers due to integration and a closer brand/product synergy with the Tournament (I can watch the games at Hooters. KFC, Enterprise and State Farm seem to be just borrowing consumer interest in the tournament).
Positives for Creating Your Own Path include exclusivity and brand building. Like Hooters, BWW has a nice product synergy as a restaurant. Also, they are not sharing the spotlight with ESPN, Fox or CBS Sports. The primary drawback is BWW has to spend money to generate interest and traffic to the contest. I found out about the Bracket Challenge through a BWW email.
Although both strategies have merit, I think there is a bigger opportunity. The opportunity to build on the natural behavior of filling out the bracket. The opportunity to be part of the bracket conversation.
In my opinion, the most interesting bracket site does not exist this year. For several years Coke Zero offered an entertaining, bracket generating tool called the Bracket-o-matic. I discussed the application in a blog last year (Let the Bracket-o-Matic Madness Begin).
The advantage of the Bracket-o-Matic is it accentuated the process of filling out brackets. It built upon the natural behavior of completing a bracket. It aided the process of deciding which team will win. For example, does North Dakota State have a shot at beating Kansas in the opening round? Or will Purdue get to the Final Four?
With this said, you only have til tomorrow noon to complete your brackets. Good Luck!